Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Opera Gallery Trading Ltd. v. Golden Trade Fine Art Inc., 2:15-cv-00569-SVW-KLS. (2016)

Court: District Court, C.D. California Number: infdco20160923a07 Visitors: 5
Filed: Sep. 22, 2016
Latest Update: Sep. 22, 2016
Summary: [PROPOSED] JUDGMENT STEPHEN V. WILSON , District Judge . JUDGMENT On July 28, 2015, the Court entered an order granting Plaintiffs Opera Gallery Trading Ltd. and Najell Investments Ltd., as trustee of The Global Art Private Trust, (collectively, "Plaintiffs") motion for summary judgment against defendants Golden Trade Fine Art Inc. and Gailord Bovrisse (collectively,"Golden Trade Defendants") as to Plaintiffs' claims for rescission, breach of contract and conversion. On June 30, 2016,
More

[PROPOSED] JUDGMENT

JUDGMENT

On July 28, 2015, the Court entered an order granting Plaintiffs Opera Gallery Trading Ltd. and Najell Investments Ltd., as trustee of The Global Art Private Trust, (collectively, "Plaintiffs") motion for summary judgment against defendants Golden Trade Fine Art Inc. and Gailord Bovrisse (collectively,"Golden Trade Defendants") as to Plaintiffs' claims for rescission, breach of contract and conversion.

On June 30, 2016, the Court granted summary judgment in favor of defendants Nathalie Biju-Duval and Rubin Associates International, Inc. (collectively, "RAI Defendants") and against Plaintiffs with respect to Plaintiffs' claim for aiding and abetting a conversion.

On September 8, 2016, the Court granted Plaintiffs application for entry of default judgment by the Court against the Golden Trade Defendants as to Plaintiffs' claim for violation of California Penal Code section 496 and request for attorneys' fees and costs.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED:

Judgment is hereby entered in favor of Plaintiffs against Golden Trade Fine Art, Inc., and Gailord Bovrisse, jointly and severally, on Plaintiffs' claims for recession, breach of contract, conversion, and violation of California Penal Code section 496.

Plaintiffs' remaining claims for unjust enrichment/money had and received and negligent misrepresentation are hereby dismissed pursuant to Plaintiffs' request.

Accordingly, Plaintiffs are awarded attorneys' fees in the amount of $123,225.75; costs in the amount of $8,416.28 pursuant to Local Rule 55-3; and $2,400,000 in treble damages.

Judgment is hereby entered in favor of the RAI Defendants against Plaintiffs with respect to Plaintiffs' claim for Aiding and Abetting Conversion.

Plaintiffs shall take nothing from the RAI Defendants.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer