Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Ling Tie v. Peng Chan, Case 5:14-CV-01211-bro (RZX). (2016)

Court: District Court, C.D. California Number: infdco20160930a48 Visitors: 12
Filed: Sep. 28, 2016
Latest Update: Sep. 28, 2016
Summary: REQUEST FOR VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL (FRCP 41(a)(2)); [PROPOSED] ORDER OF DISMISSAL BEVERLY REID O'CONNELL , District Judge . NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that pursuant to Settlement and Release between all appearing parties to the present action: 1. The settlement as between parties LING TIE, MBLT INVESTMENTS, LLC, DINESH SHARDA, HARVINDER SANDHU, RON SANDHU, and PENG CHAN called for payments over time with the final payments scheduled for on or about September 5, 2016. 2. These payments have been
More

REQUEST FOR VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL (FRCP 41(a)(2)); [PROPOSED] ORDER OF DISMISSAL

NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that pursuant to Settlement and Release between all appearing parties to the present action:

1. The settlement as between parties LING TIE, MBLT INVESTMENTS, LLC, DINESH SHARDA, HARVINDER SANDHU, RON SANDHU, and PENG CHAN called for payments over time with the final payments scheduled for on or about September 5, 2016. 2. These payments have been completed.

Therefore,

1. Plaintiff, LING TIE, voluntarily dismisses the Complaint filed against Defendants, MBLT INVESTMENTS, LLC, DINESH SHARDA, HARVINDER SANDHU, RON SANDHU, and PENG CHAN in the above-captioned action with prejudice. 2. MBLT INVESTMENTS, LLC, DINESH SHARDA, HARVINDER SANDHU, RON SANDHU, and PENG CHAN have voluntarily dismissed all Cross-Claims against one another in the above-captioned action with prejudice. 3. PENG CHAN has voluntarily dismissed all Counter-Claims against WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A. in the above-captioned action with prejudice. 3. The Cross-Complaint of PENG CHAN as it applies to Cross-Defendant, EMILE AUGUSTE, JR. has been dismissed by order of court (Docket #161). 4. As a result, this matter is complete and final.

ORDER

Upon consideration of the Request for Voluntary Dismissal (FRCP 41(a)(2)), and good cause appearing therefor,

It is HEREBY ORDERED that the entire action be dismissed with prejudice.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer