Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

JULIO v. GLICK, 2:15-cv-131-JVS (GJS). (2016)

Court: District Court, C.D. California Number: infdco20161019820 Visitors: 18
Filed: Oct. 18, 2016
Latest Update: Oct. 18, 2016
Summary: ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE JAMES V. SELNA , District Judge . Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636, the Court has reviewed the Third Amended Complaint and all pleadings, motions, and other documents filed in this action, the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge ("Report"), and Plaintiff's Objections to the Report. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(C) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b), the Court has conducted a de novo review of those
More

ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the Third Amended Complaint and all pleadings, motions, and other documents filed in this action, the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge ("Report"), and Plaintiff's Objections to the Report. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b), the Court has conducted a de novo review of those portions of the Report to which objections have been stated.

The Court accepts the findings and recommendations set forth in the Report. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that:

(1) Defendants' Motion to Dismiss [Dkt. 60] is GRANTED (2) the Third Amended Complaint is dismissed without leave to amend; and (3) Judgment shall be entered dismissing this action.

LET JUDGMENT BE ENTERED ACCORDINGLY.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer