EDWARDS v. MARTINEZ, CV16-2119 ODW (AJW). (2016)
Court: District Court, C.D. California
Number: infdco20161104b02
Visitors: 25
Filed: Nov. 01, 2016
Latest Update: Nov. 01, 2016
Summary: ORDER DISMISSING ACTION FOR FAILURE TO PROSECUTE OTIS D. WRIGHT, II , District Judge . Defendant filed a motion to dismiss the complaint. On September 21, 2016, the court issued an order directing that any opposition to the motion be filed within 21 days. The order informed plaintiff that the failure to file opposition might result in the granting of the motion or the dismissal of this case for failure to prosecute, failure to comply with the court's order, or failure to comply with the loc
Summary: ORDER DISMISSING ACTION FOR FAILURE TO PROSECUTE OTIS D. WRIGHT, II , District Judge . Defendant filed a motion to dismiss the complaint. On September 21, 2016, the court issued an order directing that any opposition to the motion be filed within 21 days. The order informed plaintiff that the failure to file opposition might result in the granting of the motion or the dismissal of this case for failure to prosecute, failure to comply with the court's order, or failure to comply with the loca..
More
ORDER DISMISSING ACTION FOR FAILURE TO PROSECUTE
OTIS D. WRIGHT, II, District Judge.
Defendant filed a motion to dismiss the complaint. On September 21, 2016, the court issued an order directing that any opposition to the motion be filed within 21 days. The order informed plaintiff that the failure to file opposition might result in the granting of the motion or the dismissal of this case for failure to prosecute, failure to comply with the court's order, or failure to comply with the local rules. As of the date of this order, no opposition to the motion has been filed, and no request for an extension of time within which to file opposition has been received. Therefore, this case is dismissed without prejudice. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b).
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
