Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

LOCKWOOD v. CALIFORNIA HORSE RACING BOARD, 2:16-CV-02964-CAS-E. (2016)

Court: District Court, C.D. California Number: infdco20161114b46 Visitors: 6
Filed: Sep. 29, 2016
Latest Update: Sep. 29, 2016
Summary: ORDER ON STIPULATION RE: DISMISSAL OF CLAIMS AND REMAND TO STATE COURT CHRISTINA A. SNYDER , District Judge . Plaintiff Donald Lockwood and Defendants California Horse Racing Board, Charles Winner, Bo Derek, Rick Baedeker, Richard Rosenberg, George Krikorian, Jesse Choper, Steve Beneto, and Madeline Aeurbach, by and through their counsel of record, submit the following stipulation and order to the Court. WHEREAS: (1) Plaintiff's Complaint for Damages was filed in the Superior Court of
More

ORDER ON STIPULATION RE: DISMISSAL OF CLAIMS AND REMAND TO STATE COURT

Plaintiff Donald Lockwood and Defendants California Horse Racing Board, Charles Winner, Bo Derek, Rick Baedeker, Richard Rosenberg, George Krikorian, Jesse Choper, Steve Beneto, and Madeline Aeurbach, by and through their counsel of record, submit the following stipulation and order to the Court.

WHEREAS:

(1) Plaintiff's Complaint for Damages was filed in the Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles, on February 25, 2016;

(2) Defendants removed the matter to federal court under federal question jurisdiction on May 3, 2016;

(3) A Scheduling Conference was held before the Honorable Christina A. Snyder on August 29, 2016;

(4) The Scheduling Conference was continued to October 17, 2016; and

(5) Plaintiff agrees to dismiss certain claims, which would leave this Court without subject matter jurisdiction over this case.

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

(1) Plaintiff's third (Violation of 42 U.S.C. 1983), fourth (Violation of 42 U.S.C. 1985(3)), fifth (Violation of 42 U.S.C. 1986), and sixth (Negligent Hiring, Training, and/or Supervision) causes of action are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE;

(2) Defendants Charles Winner, Bo Derek, Rick Baedeker, Richard Rosenberg, George Krikorian, Jesse Choper, Steve Beneto, and Madeline Aeurbach are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE; and

(3) This case is REMANDED to the state court from which it was removed.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer