ABSORPTION PHARMACEUTICALS, LLC v. ENDURE HOLDINGS, LLC, 2:16-cv-01405-RGK-(JPRx). (2016)
Court: District Court, C.D. California
Number: infdco20161118854
Visitors: 31
Filed: Nov. 16, 2016
Latest Update: Nov. 16, 2016
Summary: [PROPOSED] JUDGMENT AGAINST ROBERT CARLSON R. GARY KLAUSNER , District Judge . After having fully considered the Motion for Default Judgment against Robert Carlson brought by Plaintiff Absorption Pharmaceuticals, LLC ("Plaintiff' or "Absorption"), as well as the issues and evidence presented and all files and pleadings in this action, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED AND ADJUDGED by the Court that Judgment shall be and is hereby entered against Defendant Robert Carlson ("Carlson")in the above-captio
Summary: [PROPOSED] JUDGMENT AGAINST ROBERT CARLSON R. GARY KLAUSNER , District Judge . After having fully considered the Motion for Default Judgment against Robert Carlson brought by Plaintiff Absorption Pharmaceuticals, LLC ("Plaintiff' or "Absorption"), as well as the issues and evidence presented and all files and pleadings in this action, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED AND ADJUDGED by the Court that Judgment shall be and is hereby entered against Defendant Robert Carlson ("Carlson")in the above-caption..
More
[PROPOSED] JUDGMENT AGAINST ROBERT CARLSON
R. GARY KLAUSNER, District Judge.
After having fully considered the Motion for Default Judgment against Robert Carlson brought by Plaintiff Absorption Pharmaceuticals, LLC ("Plaintiff' or "Absorption"), as well as the issues and evidence presented and all files and pleadings in this action, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED AND ADJUDGED by the Court that Judgment shall be and is hereby entered against Defendant Robert Carlson ("Carlson")in the above-captioned action as follows:
1. The Court finds that Carlson committed the acts referred to in Plaintiffs Motion for Default Judgment against Robert Carlson and that Carlson's acts constitute:
a. False Association under Section 43(a) of the Lanham Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1125(a)(1)(A);
b. False Advertising under Section 43(a) of the Lanham Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1125(a)(1)(B).
2. Defendant is ordered to pay damages to Plaintiffs in the amount of $209,246.40.
3. The Court finds that for purposes of 15 U.S.C. § 1117(a), an award of increased damages in merited.
4. Defendant is ordered to pay increased damages to Plaintiffs in the amount of:
5. The Court finds that for purposes of 15 U.S.C. § 1117(a), this constitutes an exceptional case meriting the award of attorneys' fees to Plaintiff.
6. Defendant is ordered to pay Plaintiffs attorneys' fees in the amount of #7,785, calculated pursuant to the schedule contained in Local Rule 55-3.
7. Defendant is ordered to pay Plaintiffs' non-taxable costs in the amount to be determined following entry ofjudgment.
8. Defendant is ordered to pay to Plaintiffs postjudgment interest on the amount ofjudgment at a statutory rate pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1961(a).
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
