TWINING v. PALMER SYSTEMS, INC., 8:15-CV-02147-JLS-KES. (2016)
Court: District Court, C.D. California
Number: infdco20161214787
Visitors: 20
Filed: Dec. 13, 2016
Latest Update: Dec. 13, 2016
Summary: ORDER RE: STIPULATED DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE JOSEPHINE L. STATON , District Judge . ORDER Having reviewed the Stipulation by and between Plaintiff MAXWELL E. TWINING and Defendants PALMER SYSTEMS, INC. d/b/a SONOMA COUNTY CREDIT SERVICE ("Palmer") concerning the voluntary dismissal with prejudice of the above-entitled action pursuant to written settlement agreement conditioned on this Court retaining jurisdiction to enforce the settlement agreement under California Code of Civil Procedur
Summary: ORDER RE: STIPULATED DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE JOSEPHINE L. STATON , District Judge . ORDER Having reviewed the Stipulation by and between Plaintiff MAXWELL E. TWINING and Defendants PALMER SYSTEMS, INC. d/b/a SONOMA COUNTY CREDIT SERVICE ("Palmer") concerning the voluntary dismissal with prejudice of the above-entitled action pursuant to written settlement agreement conditioned on this Court retaining jurisdiction to enforce the settlement agreement under California Code of Civil Procedure..
More
ORDER RE: STIPULATED DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE
JOSEPHINE L. STATON, District Judge.
ORDER
Having reviewed the Stipulation by and between Plaintiff MAXWELL E. TWINING and Defendants PALMER SYSTEMS, INC. d/b/a SONOMA COUNTY CREDIT SERVICE ("Palmer") concerning the voluntary dismissal with prejudice of the above-entitled action pursuant to written settlement agreement conditioned on this Court retaining jurisdiction to enforce the settlement agreement under California Code of Civil Procedure §664.6 and pursuant to Hagestad v. Tragesser (1995) 49 F.3d 1430, and good cause appearing therefor, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT:
1. Plaintiff's claims are to be dismissed with prejudice, while the claims of any putative class are to be dismissed without prejudice.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
