SHELTON v. TATITLEK SUPPORT SERVICES, INC., 2:15-cv-06519-SVW (PJRx). (2016)
Court: District Court, C.D. California
Number: infdco20170106h08
Visitors: 11
Filed: Dec. 13, 2016
Latest Update: Dec. 13, 2016
Summary: [PROPOSED] ORDER RE DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE AND BOND EXONERATION FOLLOWING SETTLEMENT OF THE NUR CLASS ACTION AND ITS FINAL APPROVAL BY THIS COURT STEPHEN V. WILSON , District Judge . The Court, having been advised that the Plaintiff in this action is covered by the class and collective action settlement and class release reached in Nur, et al. v. Tatitlek Support Services, Inc. et al., United States District Court for the Central District of California, Case No. 15-CV-00094 SVW
Summary: [PROPOSED] ORDER RE DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE AND BOND EXONERATION FOLLOWING SETTLEMENT OF THE NUR CLASS ACTION AND ITS FINAL APPROVAL BY THIS COURT STEPHEN V. WILSON , District Judge . The Court, having been advised that the Plaintiff in this action is covered by the class and collective action settlement and class release reached in Nur, et al. v. Tatitlek Support Services, Inc. et al., United States District Court for the Central District of California, Case No. 15-CV-00094 SVW ..
More
[PROPOSED] ORDER RE DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE AND BOND EXONERATION FOLLOWING SETTLEMENT OF THE NUR CLASS ACTION AND ITS FINAL APPROVAL BY THIS COURT
STEPHEN V. WILSON, District Judge.
The Court, having been advised that the Plaintiff in this action is covered by the class and collective action settlement and class release reached in Nur, et al. v. Tatitlek Support Services, Inc. et al., United States District Court for the Central District of California, Case No. 15-CV-00094 SVW (the "Nur Action"). The Court further recognizes that this Court's "Order Granting Final Approval of Class Action Settlement" in the Nur Action expressly and specifically included Plaintiffs' proceedings as being among those "DLSE Award Claimants Whose Trial De Novo Proceedings Are Dismissed With Prejudice." (See Nur Action Document 81 at pages 84-86 of 87 (attaching Documents 79-80 (the Nur Action Final Approval Order) as exhibits thereto).) The Court further observes that this Court's the Nur Action Final Approval Order provides for "authorizing the release of any bond posted by Defendants in connection with" this action. (Nur Action Document 80 at ¶ 22)
Based on the foregoing, and finding good cause therefor, the Court hereby finds that the above-captioned action has been resolved in connection with the Nur Action, and ORDERS that the above-captioned action is hereby DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE and any bond posted in connection with the above-captioned action is hereby exonerated.
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED.
Source: Leagle