DIETER v. CarMAX AUTO SUPERSTORES CALIFORNIA, LLC, 5:16-cv-2448 PA (SPx). (2017)
Court: District Court, C.D. California
Number: infdco20170322839
Visitors: 26
Filed: Mar. 21, 2017
Latest Update: Mar. 21, 2017
Summary: ORDER ON STIPULATION OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL PURSUANT TO FRCP 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) [JURY TRIAL DEMANDED] PERCY ANDERSON , District Judge . On March 20, 2017 Plaintiffs KELSEY M. DIETER and GEORGE HENRY DIETER III, along with Defendant CARMAX AUTO SUPERSTORES CALIFORNIA, LLC, entered into a stipulation pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. By the stipulation, the Parties agreed that the above-captioned action is voluntarily dismissed with prejudice in its enti
Summary: ORDER ON STIPULATION OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL PURSUANT TO FRCP 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) [JURY TRIAL DEMANDED] PERCY ANDERSON , District Judge . On March 20, 2017 Plaintiffs KELSEY M. DIETER and GEORGE HENRY DIETER III, along with Defendant CARMAX AUTO SUPERSTORES CALIFORNIA, LLC, entered into a stipulation pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. By the stipulation, the Parties agreed that the above-captioned action is voluntarily dismissed with prejudice in its entir..
More
ORDER ON STIPULATION OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL PURSUANT TO FRCP 41(a)(1)(A)(ii)
[JURY TRIAL DEMANDED]
PERCY ANDERSON, District Judge.
On March 20, 2017 Plaintiffs KELSEY M. DIETER and GEORGE HENRY DIETER III, along with Defendant CARMAX AUTO SUPERSTORES CALIFORNIA, LLC, entered into a stipulation pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.
By the stipulation, the Parties agreed that the above-captioned action is voluntarily dismissed with prejudice in its entirety.
Therefore, good cause having been shown and the parties having stipulated to same, the Court hereby makes the following order:
IT IS ORDERED THAT:
1. This entire action is dismissed with prejudice, and each party shall bear their own fees and costs.
Source: Leagle
