Filed: Mar. 24, 2017
Latest Update: Mar. 24, 2017
Summary: ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE OTIS D. WRIGHT, II , District Judge . On March 3, 2017, Plaintiff filed a motion for a preliminary injunction and noticed a hearing for April 10, 2017. (ECF No. 13.) Per Central District of California Local Rule 7-9, Defendant's opposition to the motion was due twenty-one days prior to the April 10, 2017 hearing. Defendant did not submit an opposition by that date. Therefore, the Court orders Defendant to show cause by March 30, 2017, why the motion should be not granted
Summary: ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE OTIS D. WRIGHT, II , District Judge . On March 3, 2017, Plaintiff filed a motion for a preliminary injunction and noticed a hearing for April 10, 2017. (ECF No. 13.) Per Central District of California Local Rule 7-9, Defendant's opposition to the motion was due twenty-one days prior to the April 10, 2017 hearing. Defendant did not submit an opposition by that date. Therefore, the Court orders Defendant to show cause by March 30, 2017, why the motion should be not granted ..
More
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE
OTIS D. WRIGHT, II, District Judge.
On March 3, 2017, Plaintiff filed a motion for a preliminary injunction and noticed a hearing for April 10, 2017. (ECF No. 13.) Per Central District of California Local Rule 7-9, Defendant's opposition to the motion was due twenty-one days prior to the April 10, 2017 hearing. Defendant did not submit an opposition by that date. Therefore, the Court orders Defendant to show cause by March 30, 2017, why the motion should be not granted as unopposed pursuant to Central District Local Rule 7-12.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
