ENBORG v. FRAUENHEIM, CV 16-5343-VAP (JPR). (2017)
Court: District Court, C.D. California
Number: infdco20170403821
Visitors: 17
Filed: Mar. 30, 2017
Latest Update: Mar. 30, 2017
Summary: ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE VIRGINIA A. PHILLIPS , Chief District Judge . Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636, the Court has reviewed the Petition, records on file, and Report and Recommendation of U.S. Magistrate Judge. Although the Court granted Petitioner an extension of time to file objections to the Report and Recommendation, no objections have been timely filed. The Court accepts the findings and recommendations of the Magistrate Judge. IT THEREFORE
Summary: ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE VIRGINIA A. PHILLIPS , Chief District Judge . Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636, the Court has reviewed the Petition, records on file, and Report and Recommendation of U.S. Magistrate Judge. Although the Court granted Petitioner an extension of time to file objections to the Report and Recommendation, no objections have been timely filed. The Court accepts the findings and recommendations of the Magistrate Judge. IT THEREFORE I..
More
ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE
VIRGINIA A. PHILLIPS, Chief District Judge.
Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the Petition, records on file, and Report and Recommendation of U.S. Magistrate Judge. Although the Court granted Petitioner an extension of time to file objections to the Report and Recommendation, no objections have been timely filed. The Court accepts the findings and recommendations of the Magistrate Judge.
IT THEREFORE IS ORDERED that the Petition is denied and Judgment be entered dismissing this action with prejudice.
Source: Leagle
