DOE I v. NESTLÉ, S.A., CV-05-5133-SVW. (2017)
Court: District Court, C.D. California
Number: infdco20170404740
Visitors: 9
Filed: Mar. 31, 2017
Latest Update: Mar. 31, 2017
Summary: [PROPOSED] JUDGMENT IN FAVOR OF DEFENDANTS STEPHEN V. WILSON , District Judge . On March 2, 2017, the Court entered an Order granting Defendants' Motions to Dismiss (Dkt. Nos. 211, 212) without leave to amend as to Plaintiffs' entire action, including all remaining causes of action asserted in Plaintiffs' Second Amended Complaint (Dkt. No. 208) (the "Order"). (Dkt. No. 249.) IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED AS FOLLOWS : that the Plaintiffs John Doe II, John Doe III, John Doe
Summary: [PROPOSED] JUDGMENT IN FAVOR OF DEFENDANTS STEPHEN V. WILSON , District Judge . On March 2, 2017, the Court entered an Order granting Defendants' Motions to Dismiss (Dkt. Nos. 211, 212) without leave to amend as to Plaintiffs' entire action, including all remaining causes of action asserted in Plaintiffs' Second Amended Complaint (Dkt. No. 208) (the "Order"). (Dkt. No. 249.) IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED AS FOLLOWS : that the Plaintiffs John Doe II, John Doe III, John Doe I..
More
[PROPOSED] JUDGMENT IN FAVOR OF DEFENDANTS
STEPHEN V. WILSON, District Judge.
On March 2, 2017, the Court entered an Order granting Defendants' Motions to Dismiss (Dkt. Nos. 211, 212) without leave to amend as to Plaintiffs' entire action, including all remaining causes of action asserted in Plaintiffs' Second Amended Complaint (Dkt. No. 208) (the "Order"). (Dkt. No. 249.)
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED AS FOLLOWS: that the Plaintiffs John Doe II, John Doe III, John Doe IV, John Doe V, and John Doe VI, individually and on behalf of proposed class members, recover nothing, that their claims be dismissed wihtout leave to amended, and that judgement be entered in favor of Defendants Cargill, Incorporated and Nestlé USA, Inc.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
