LUCIDUS TECH CO. v. EKO DEVELOPMENT LIMITED, 16-CV-01531 JAK (JEMx). (2017)
Court: District Court, C.D. California
Number: infdco20170410437
Visitors: 7
Filed: Mar. 28, 2017
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: ORDER DISMISSING CASE WITH PREJUDICE JS-6 JOHN A. KRONSTADT , District Judge . ORDER DISMISSING CASE WITH PREJUDICE Plaintiff Lucidus Tech Co and defendant EKO Development Ltd. (collectively, the "Parties") have entered into a confidential settlement agreement ("Agreement") to resolve this action. The Parties stipulated to request the Court to sequentially reopen the case, retain jurisdiction to enforce the settlement agreement, and then dismiss the case with prejudice. The Court has alre
Summary: ORDER DISMISSING CASE WITH PREJUDICE JS-6 JOHN A. KRONSTADT , District Judge . ORDER DISMISSING CASE WITH PREJUDICE Plaintiff Lucidus Tech Co and defendant EKO Development Ltd. (collectively, the "Parties") have entered into a confidential settlement agreement ("Agreement") to resolve this action. The Parties stipulated to request the Court to sequentially reopen the case, retain jurisdiction to enforce the settlement agreement, and then dismiss the case with prejudice. The Court has alrea..
More
ORDER DISMISSING CASE WITH PREJUDICE JS-6
JOHN A. KRONSTADT, District Judge.
ORDER DISMISSING CASE WITH PREJUDICE
Plaintiff Lucidus Tech Co and defendant EKO Development Ltd. (collectively, the "Parties") have entered into a confidential settlement agreement ("Agreement") to resolve this action. The Parties stipulated to request the Court to sequentially reopen the case, retain jurisdiction to enforce the settlement agreement, and then dismiss the case with prejudice. The Court has already signed orders to (a) reopen the case, and (b) retain jurisdiction.
Therefore, the Court hereby dismisses this case WITH PREJUDICE.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
