JUDGMENT

BEVERLY R. O'CONNELL, District Judge.

This action came on regularly for trial on February 21, 2017, in Courtroom "7C" of the United States District Court, Central District of California, Central Division, the Honorable Beverly Reid O'Connell, Judge Presiding. The Plaintiff LILIA ABREGO FIGUEROA, was represented by attorneys Shanta Driver and Ronald Cruz. The Defendants CITY OF LOS ANGELES, CHIEF CHARLIE BECK, SERGEANT ROBERT CALDERON and SERGEANT JEFF MARES were present and represented by attorneys Colleen R. Smith and Cory M. Brente.

The trial was bifurcated, with phase I addressing liability and compensatory damages only.

A jury of 8 persons was regularly impaneled and sworn on February 21, 2017. Witnesses were sworn and testified. On March 2, 2017, following the presentation of evidence and argument during a jury trial, the jury, in the above-entitled action, UNANIMOUSLY found as follows:

JUDGMENT ON SPECIAL VERDICT

WE, THE JURY in the above-entitled action, unanimously find as follows on the questions submitted to us:

CLAIMS BY ABREGO PLAINTIFFS AGAINST DEFENDANTS

(QUESTION NOS. 2 through 10 solely address claims brought in the related matter of Maria Teresa Abrego, et al., v. City of Los Angeles, et al., CV15-00039 BRO (JEMx) only, and thus, are omitted from the judgment herein.)

QUESTION NO. 1: Have the Abrego Plaintiffs proved that any of the following Defendants violated Omar Abrego's Fourth Amendment Constitutional Rights by using excessive force to detain him?

Answer (check "Yes" or "No") following the name of each Defendant:

If you answered "No" as to each of the Defendants, skip to Question No. 3.

If you answered "Yes" as to any Defendant, proceed to Question No. 2.

CLAIMS BY PLAINTIFF FIGUEROA AGAINST DEFENDANTS

QUESTION NO. 11: If you gave only "No" responses to Question No. 1, please proceed to Question No. 13. If you gave any "Yes" responses to Question No. 1, please answer the following question. Has Plaintiff Figueroa proved that any of the following Defendants violated her Fourteenth Amendment Constitutional Rights to a familial association with Omar Abrego by using unreasonable force to detain him and with an unlawful purpose to harm him?

Answer (check "Yes" or "No") following the name of each Defendant for whom you answered "Yes" in Question No. 1:

If you answered "No" as to each of the Defendants, skip to Question No. 13.

If you answered "Yes" as to any Defendant, proceed to Question No. 12.

QUESTION NO. 12: For each "Yes" response to Question No. 11, do you find that Plaintiff Figueroa has proved that the Defendant's conduct was the cause of injury to her?

Answer (check "Yes" or "No") following the name of only that Defendant for whom you answered "Yes" in Question No. 11:

Please proceed to Question No. 13.

QUESTION NO. 13: Has Plaintiff Figueroa proved under California law that the following Defendant intentionally inflicted emotional distress on her?

Answer (check "Yes" or "No") following the name of each Defendant:

If you answered "No" as to each of the Defendants, skip to Question No. 15. If you answered "Yes" as to any Defendant, proceed to Question No. 14.

QUESTION NO. 14: For each "Yes" response to Question No. 13, do you find that Plaintiff Figueroa has proved that the Defendant's conduct was a substantial factor in causing her harm?

Please proceed to Question No. 15.

QUESTION NO. 15: Has Plaintiff Figueroa proved that the following Defendant negligently inflicted emotional distress on her?

If you answered "No", skip to Question No. 17.

If you answered "Yes", proceed to Question No. 16.

QUESTION NO. 16: For each "Yes" response to Question No. 15, do you find that Plaintiff Figueroa has proved that the Defendant's conduct was a substantial factor in causing her harm?

Please proceed to Question No. 17.

DAMAGES AS TO PLAINTIFF FIGUEROA ONLY

If you gave any "Yes" responses to either Question Nos. 12, 14 and/or 16 please answer the following questions. Otherwise, please sign and a date this form where indicated below.

QUESTION NO. 17: If you gave any "Yes" responses to Question Nos. 12, 14, or 16:

What is the total amount of economic damages suffered by Plaintiff Figueroa? $__________________.

What is the total amount of noneconomic damages suffered by Plaintiff Figueroa? $__________________.

Please proceed to Question No. 18.

QUESTION NO. 18: If you gave any "Yes" responses to Question No. 12, has Plaintiff Figueroa proved by a preponderance of the evidence that any of the following Defendants acted with malice, fraud or oppression?

Answer (check "Yes" or "No") following the name of only that Defendant for whom you answered "Yes" in Question No. 12:

Please proceed to Question No. 19.

QUESTION NO. 19: If you gave any "Yes" responses to Question No. 14, has Plaintiff Figueroa proved by clear and convincing evidence that the following Defendants acted with malice, oppression or fraud when they intentionally inflicted emotional distress?

Answer (check "Yes" or "No") if you answered "Yes" in Question No. 14:

Please proceed to Question No. 20.

QUESTION NO. 20: If you gave any "Yes" answers to Question No. 15 and you entered any amounts in response to Question No. 17, what percentage of responsibility for Plaintiff Figueroa's harm do you assign to each of the following persons (Do not include any Defendant for whom you did not answer "Yes" in Question No. 15)?

Please date and sign below, and return this form to the Court. Thank you.

By reason of dismissals, the rulings of the Court, and the special verdict, Defendants CITY OF LOS ANGELES, CHIEF CHARLIE BECK, SERGEANT ROBERT CALDERON and SERGEANT JEFF MARES are entitled to judgment against Plaintiff LILIA ABREGO FIGUEROA.

Now, therefore, it is ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that Plaintiff LILIA ABREGO FIGUEROA, have and recover nothing by reason of each and all her claims as set forth in the Complaint against Defendants CITY OF LOS ANGELES, CHIEF CHARLIE BECK, SERGEANT ROBERT CALDERON and SERGEANT JEFF MARES and that Defendants shall recover their costs in accordance with Local Rule 54.

JUDGMENT IS HEREBY ENTERED IN FAVOR OF ALL DEFENDANTS ON ALL CLAIMS AGAINST PLAINTIFF LILIA ABREGO FIGUEROA.

IT IS SO ORDERED.