MAX CHUNG LIN v. GEICO GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY, 2:16-cv-06556-RGK-JPR. (2017)
Court: District Court, C.D. California
Number: infdco20170629a66
Visitors: 7
Filed: Jun. 27, 2017
Latest Update: Jun. 27, 2017
Summary: JUDGMENT R. GARY KLAUSNER , District Judge . It appearing from the files and records of this action that, on June 19, 2017, the Motion For Summary Judgment or, Alternatively, Motion for Partial Summary Judgment by Defendant Government Employees Insurance Company's ("GEICO") (erroneously sued as "GEICO General Insurance Company") regarding the Complaint of Plaintiffs Max Chung Lin and Liliana Lanza (collectively "Plaintiffs") was granted and good cause having been shown; IT IS HEREBY ORDERE
Summary: JUDGMENT R. GARY KLAUSNER , District Judge . It appearing from the files and records of this action that, on June 19, 2017, the Motion For Summary Judgment or, Alternatively, Motion for Partial Summary Judgment by Defendant Government Employees Insurance Company's ("GEICO") (erroneously sued as "GEICO General Insurance Company") regarding the Complaint of Plaintiffs Max Chung Lin and Liliana Lanza (collectively "Plaintiffs") was granted and good cause having been shown; IT IS HEREBY ORDERED..
More
JUDGMENT
R. GARY KLAUSNER, District Judge.
It appearing from the files and records of this action that, on June 19, 2017, the Motion For Summary Judgment or, Alternatively, Motion for Partial Summary Judgment by Defendant Government Employees Insurance Company's ("GEICO") (erroneously sued as "GEICO General Insurance Company") regarding the Complaint of Plaintiffs Max Chung Lin and Liliana Lanza (collectively "Plaintiffs") was granted and good cause having been shown;
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that:
1. Plaintiffs take nothing by way of their Complaint with respect to Defendant GEICO, and a judgment be entered in favor of Defendant GEICO and against Plaintiffs Max Chung Lin and Liliana Lanza on the Complaint.
Source: Leagle
