Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

U.S., STATE EX REL. DOE v. PAMC, LTD., CV 13-04273 RGK (MRWx). (2017)

Court: District Court, C.D. California Number: infdco20170710740 Visitors: 28
Filed: Jul. 07, 2017
Latest Update: Jul. 07, 2017
Summary: [PROPOSED] ORDER OF DISMISSAL OF ACTION [FILED CONCURRENTLY HEREWITH: JOINT STIPULATED REQUEST FOR DISMISSAL OF ACTION AGAINST DEFENDANTS] R. GARY KLAUSNER , District Judge . Plaintiffs United States of America ("United States"), the State of California ("California"), and the qui tam plaintiff ("Relator"), having jointly requested, pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, 31 U.S.C. 3730(b)(1) and Cal. Govt. Code 12652(c)(1), and in accordance with and subj
More

[PROPOSED] ORDER OF DISMISSAL OF ACTION

[FILED CONCURRENTLY HEREWITH: JOINT STIPULATED REQUEST FOR DISMISSAL OF ACTION AGAINST DEFENDANTS]

Plaintiffs United States of America ("United States"), the State of California ("California"), and the qui tam plaintiff ("Relator"), having jointly requested, pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, 31 U.S.C. § 3730(b)(1) and Cal. Govt. Code § 12652(c)(1), and in accordance with and subject to the Settlement Agreement of June 27, 2017 ("the Settlement Agreement"), among these parties and Defendants PAMC, Ltd. and Pacific Alliance Medical Center, Inc., that the above-referenced action ("this action") be dismissed,

IT IS ORDERED that:

1. With respect to the Covered Conduct as defined in the Settlement Agreement, this action is dismissed with prejudice as to the United States, the State of California, and the Relator;

2. With respect to conduct that is outside the Covered Conduct as defined in the Settlement Agreement, this action is dismissed without prejudice as to the United States and the State of California, and is dismissed with prejudice as to the Relator.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer