M.S. EX REL. SHAFER v. CITY OF FONTANA, 5:16-CV-02498-JGB (DTBx). (2017)
Court: District Court, C.D. California
Number: infdco20170714681
Visitors: 3
Filed: May 24, 2017
Latest Update: May 24, 2017
Summary: ORDER GRANTING JOINT STIPULATION TO DISMISS CLAIMS AND STRIKE LANGUAGE IN PLAINTIFFS' FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT JESUS G. BERNAL , District Judge . Having reviewed the Stipulation between Plaintiffs M.S., a minor by and through her Guardian Ad Litem MELISSA SHAFER; and VINCENT AVILA, individually and Defendant CITY OF FONTANA, regarding Plaintiffs' First Amended Complaint, and GOOD CAUSE APPEARING THEREFORE, it is hereby ORDERED that: a. Plaintiffs M.S., a minor by and through her Guardian Ad
Summary: ORDER GRANTING JOINT STIPULATION TO DISMISS CLAIMS AND STRIKE LANGUAGE IN PLAINTIFFS' FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT JESUS G. BERNAL , District Judge . Having reviewed the Stipulation between Plaintiffs M.S., a minor by and through her Guardian Ad Litem MELISSA SHAFER; and VINCENT AVILA, individually and Defendant CITY OF FONTANA, regarding Plaintiffs' First Amended Complaint, and GOOD CAUSE APPEARING THEREFORE, it is hereby ORDERED that: a. Plaintiffs M.S., a minor by and through her Guardian Ad ..
More
ORDER GRANTING JOINT STIPULATION TO DISMISS CLAIMS AND STRIKE LANGUAGE IN PLAINTIFFS' FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT
JESUS G. BERNAL, District Judge.
Having reviewed the Stipulation between Plaintiffs M.S., a minor by and through her Guardian Ad Litem MELISSA SHAFER; and VINCENT AVILA, individually and Defendant CITY OF FONTANA, regarding Plaintiffs' First Amended Complaint, and GOOD CAUSE APPEARING THEREFORE, it is hereby ORDERED that:
a. Plaintiffs M.S., a minor by and through her Guardian Ad Litem MELISSA SHAFER; and VINCENT AVILA's fifth, sixth, and seventh claims for relief against Defendant CITY OF FONTANA are dismissed, without prejudice;
b. Plaintiff VINCENT AVILA's claims as to the eighth, ninth, and tenth claims for relief (false imprisonment, battery and negligence) against Defendant CITY OF FONTANA is dismissed without prejudice;
c. As to the eighth claim for relief (false imprisonment), the language regarding "wrongful death damages" is deemed stricken;
d. As to the eighth, ninth, and tenth claims for relief (false imprisonment, battery and negligence), the language regarding "attorney fees" is deemed stricken.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
