U.S. EX REL. MATESKI v. RAYTHEON COMPANY, 2:06-cv-03614-ODW(KSx). (2017)
Court: District Court, C.D. California
Number: infdco20170804818
Visitors: 5
Filed: Aug. 03, 2017
Latest Update: Aug. 03, 2017
Summary: JUDGMENT OTIS D. WRIGHT, II , District Judge . On June 9, 2006, Relator Steven Mateski filed this action on behalf of the United States of America against Defendants Raytheon Company and Northrop Grumman Corporation. (ECF No. 1.) On August 7, 2012, the Court dismissed Defendant Northrop Grumman Corporation without prejudice. (ECF No. 83.) On August 3, 2017, the Court granted Defendant Raytheon Company's Motion to Dismiss Relator's Fifth Amended Complaint without leave to amend. (ECF No. 199
Summary: JUDGMENT OTIS D. WRIGHT, II , District Judge . On June 9, 2006, Relator Steven Mateski filed this action on behalf of the United States of America against Defendants Raytheon Company and Northrop Grumman Corporation. (ECF No. 1.) On August 7, 2012, the Court dismissed Defendant Northrop Grumman Corporation without prejudice. (ECF No. 83.) On August 3, 2017, the Court granted Defendant Raytheon Company's Motion to Dismiss Relator's Fifth Amended Complaint without leave to amend. (ECF No. 199...
More
JUDGMENT
OTIS D. WRIGHT, II, District Judge.
On June 9, 2006, Relator Steven Mateski filed this action on behalf of the United States of America against Defendants Raytheon Company and Northrop Grumman Corporation. (ECF No. 1.) On August 7, 2012, the Court dismissed Defendant Northrop Grumman Corporation without prejudice. (ECF No. 83.) On August 3, 2017, the Court granted Defendant Raytheon Company's Motion to Dismiss Relator's Fifth Amended Complaint without leave to amend. (ECF No. 199.)
It is therefore ORDERED, ADKIDGED, and DECREED as follows:
1. Relator Steven Mateski and the United States of America shall recover nothing from Defendant Raytheon Company;
2. The Fifth Amended Complaint is dismissed on the merits and with prejudice;
3. Defendant Raytheon Company shall recover its costs from Relator Steven Mateski as evidenced by a Bill of Costs.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
