DANIELS v. BRENNAN, CV 14-06731 JFW (PJWx). (2017)
Court: District Court, C.D. California
Number: infdco20171109b36
Visitors: 8
Filed: Nov. 08, 2017
Latest Update: Nov. 08, 2017
Summary: DEFENDANT'S JOINT JUDGMENT; DECLARATION OF ERIKA JOHNSON-BROOKS JOHN F. WALTER , District Judge . The Court having considered the pleadings and evidence presented, and in accordance with the Statement of Decision entered herein, Having considered the Motion for Summary Judgment of defendant Megan J. Brennan, Postmaster General of the United States Postal Service ("Defendant"), the pleadings, and evidence presented in support of, and in opposition to the Motion, and in accordance with the S
Summary: DEFENDANT'S JOINT JUDGMENT; DECLARATION OF ERIKA JOHNSON-BROOKS JOHN F. WALTER , District Judge . The Court having considered the pleadings and evidence presented, and in accordance with the Statement of Decision entered herein, Having considered the Motion for Summary Judgment of defendant Megan J. Brennan, Postmaster General of the United States Postal Service ("Defendant"), the pleadings, and evidence presented in support of, and in opposition to the Motion, and in accordance with the St..
More
DEFENDANT'S JOINT JUDGMENT; DECLARATION OF ERIKA JOHNSON-BROOKS
JOHN F. WALTER, District Judge.
The Court having considered the pleadings and evidence presented, and in accordance with the Statement of Decision entered herein,
Having considered the Motion for Summary Judgment of defendant Megan J. Brennan, Postmaster General of the United States Postal Service ("Defendant"), the pleadings, and evidence presented in support of, and in opposition to the Motion, and in accordance with the Statement of Decision entered herein (Dkt. No. 52-1),
1. IT IS HEREBY ADJUDGED AND DECREED that Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment be granted and judgment is hereby entered in favor of Defendant.
2. Plaintiff's request to deny or defer this decision pursuant to Rule 56(d) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure is denied.
3. Defendant is awarded costs as the prevailing party in this action.
Source: Leagle
