Rodgers v. U.S., CV 15-9441 PA (ASx). (2017)
Court: District Court, C.D. California
Number: infdco20171113a93
Visitors: 13
Filed: Nov. 08, 2017
Latest Update: Nov. 08, 2017
Summary: JUDGMENT PERCY ANDERSON , District Judge . In accordance with the Court's October 31, 2017 Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law, it is ORDERED, ADJUDGED, and DECREED that: 1. Judgment is entered against plaintiff John Q. Rodgers ("Rodgers") and in favor of defendant the United States of America (the "Government") on the Complaint for Refund and Abatement of Tax Penalties filed by Rodgers; and 2. Judgment is entered in favor of the Government and against Rodgers on the Government's Coun
Summary: JUDGMENT PERCY ANDERSON , District Judge . In accordance with the Court's October 31, 2017 Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law, it is ORDERED, ADJUDGED, and DECREED that: 1. Judgment is entered against plaintiff John Q. Rodgers ("Rodgers") and in favor of defendant the United States of America (the "Government") on the Complaint for Refund and Abatement of Tax Penalties filed by Rodgers; and 2. Judgment is entered in favor of the Government and against Rodgers on the Government's Count..
More
JUDGMENT
PERCY ANDERSON, District Judge.
In accordance with the Court's October 31, 2017 Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law, it is ORDERED, ADJUDGED, and DECREED that:
1. Judgment is entered against plaintiff John Q. Rodgers ("Rodgers") and in favor of defendant the United States of America (the "Government") on the Complaint for Refund and Abatement of Tax Penalties filed by Rodgers; and
2. Judgment is entered in favor of the Government and against Rodgers on the Government's Counterclaim; and
3. Judgment is entered in favor of the Government and against Rodgers in the amount of $61,034.48 as of March 9, 2016, plus subsequent statutory accruals, including interest; and
4. The Government shall have its costs of suit.
Source: Leagle
