HUPP v. CITY OF BEAUMONT, ED CV 14-1303-VAP (SP). (2017)
Court: District Court, C.D. California
Number: infdco20171120859
Filed: Nov. 15, 2017
Latest Update: Nov. 15, 2017
Summary: ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE VIRGINIA A. PHILLIPS , Chief District Judge . Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636, the Court has reviewed the Second Amended Complaint, records on file, and the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge. Further, the Court has engaged in a de novo review of those portions of the Report to which plaintiff has objected. The Court accepts the findings and recommendation of the Magistrate Judge. IT IS T
Summary: ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE VIRGINIA A. PHILLIPS , Chief District Judge . Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636, the Court has reviewed the Second Amended Complaint, records on file, and the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge. Further, the Court has engaged in a de novo review of those portions of the Report to which plaintiff has objected. The Court accepts the findings and recommendation of the Magistrate Judge. IT IS TH..
More
ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
VIRGINIA A. PHILLIPS, Chief District Judge.
Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the Second Amended Complaint, records on file, and the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge. Further, the Court has engaged in a de novo review of those portions of the Report to which plaintiff has objected. The Court accepts the findings and recommendation of the Magistrate Judge.
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED: (1) defendant Jack Huntsman's Motion to Dismiss (docket no. 141) is granted; (2) plaintiff's motion for summary judgment or summary adjudication (docket no. 135) is consequently denied as moot; and (3) Judgment will be entered dismissing this action with prejudice.
Source: Leagle
