Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

STRATEGIC PARTNERS, INC. v. VESTAGEN PROTECTIVE TECHNOLOGIES, INC., 2:16-CV-5900-RGK. (2017)

Court: District Court, C.D. California Number: infdco20171121910 Visitors: 13
Filed: Nov. 20, 2017
Latest Update: Nov. 20, 2017
Summary: [ PROPOSED ] FINAL JUDGMENT R. GARY KLAUSNER , District Judge . IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that judgment be entered on the complaint of Plaintiff Strategic Partners, Inc. for false advertising in violation of 15 U.S.C. section 1125(a), unfair business practices in violation of California Business & Professions Code section 17200, and untrue and misleading advertising in violation of California Business & Professions Code section 17500 in favor of Defendant Vestagen Protective Technologies,
More

[ PROPOSED ] FINAL JUDGMENT

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that judgment be entered on the complaint of Plaintiff Strategic Partners, Inc. for false advertising in violation of 15 U.S.C. section 1125(a), unfair business practices in violation of California Business & Professions Code section 17200, and untrue and misleading advertising in violation of California Business & Professions Code section 17500 in favor of Defendant Vestagen Protective Technologies, Inc. and against Strategic Partners, Inc.

IT IS HEREBY FURTHER ORDERED that judgment be entered on the counterclaim of Counterclaimant Vestagen Protective Technologies for false advertising in violation of 15 U.S.C. Section 1125(a), breach of contract, and misappropriation of trade secrets in favor of Counterclaim Defendant Strategic Partners, Inc and against Counterclaimant Vestagen Protective Technologies, Inc.

IT IS HEREBY FURTHER ORDERED that the Court will decide the issues of costs and attorneys' fees after review of the parties' submissions on these issues.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer