Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Rose P. Freeman v. City of Port Hueneme, Case No: 2:16-cv-07172-JAK (GJSx). (2018)

Court: District Court, C.D. California Number: infdco20180105590 Visitors: 10
Filed: Jan. 03, 2018
Latest Update: Jan. 03, 2018
Summary: JUDGMENT JS-6 JOHN A. KRONSTADT , District Judge . The motion for summary judgment brought by defendants City of Port Case 2:16-cv-07172-JAK-GJS Document 54 Filed 01/03/18 Page 2 of 2 Page ID #:1524 Hueneme and Carmen Nichols (collectively "Defendants") having been granted, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED AS FOLLOWS: 1. Judgment is entered against Plaintiff Rose Freeman and in favor of Defendants; 2. Plaintiff Rose Freeman shall take nothing as to the claims advanced in this action, and the action i
More

JUDGMENT JS-6

The motion for summary judgment brought by defendants City of Port Case 2:16-cv-07172-JAK-GJS Document 54 Filed 01/03/18 Page 2 of 2 Page ID #:1524 Hueneme and Carmen Nichols (collectively "Defendants") having been granted, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED AS FOLLOWS:

1. Judgment is entered against Plaintiff Rose Freeman and in favor of Defendants; 2. Plaintiff Rose Freeman shall take nothing as to the claims advanced in this action, and the action is dismissed with prejudice in its entirety; and 3. Defendants may seek to recover costs in an amount to be determined based on the filing and review of the appropriate application. Any costs awarded may accrue interest at the legal rate as provided by law.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer