Andrew William Gray v. People of the State of California, EDCV 15-1748-DOC (LAL). (2018)
Court: District Court, C.D. California
Number: infdco20180105592
Visitors: 3
Filed: Jan. 03, 2018
Latest Update: Jan. 03, 2018
Summary: ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE DAVID O. CARTER , District Judge . Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636, the Court has reviewed the Third Amended Petition, the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation, Petitioner's Objections and the remaining record, and has made a de novo determination. Petitioner's Objections lack merit for the reasons stated in the Report and Recommendation. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED THAT: 1. The Report and Recommendation is
Summary: ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE DAVID O. CARTER , District Judge . Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636, the Court has reviewed the Third Amended Petition, the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation, Petitioner's Objections and the remaining record, and has made a de novo determination. Petitioner's Objections lack merit for the reasons stated in the Report and Recommendation. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED THAT: 1. The Report and Recommendation is a..
More
ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
DAVID O. CARTER, District Judge.
Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the Third Amended Petition, the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation, Petitioner's Objections and the remaining record, and has made a de novo determination.
Petitioner's Objections lack merit for the reasons stated in the Report and Recommendation.
Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED THAT:
1. The Report and Recommendation is approved and accepted;
2. Judgment be entered denying the Third Amended Petition and dismissing this action with prejudice; and
3. The Clerk serve copies of this Order on the parties.
Source: Leagle
