Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Medina, III v. County of Los Angeles, CV16-08371 MWF (JCx). (2018)

Court: District Court, C.D. California Number: infdco20180108482 Visitors: 7
Filed: Jan. 05, 2018
Latest Update: Jan. 05, 2018
Summary: ORDER TO DISMISS ENTIRE ACTION WITH PREJUDICE MICHAEL W. FITZGERALD , District Judge . On January 5, 2018, Plaintiffs HENRY RENE MEDINA III and ANTHONY MEDINA, individually and as the Successors in Interest to the Estate of Henry Rene Medina, Jr., and Defendants CITY OF LOS ANGELES, LOS ANGELES POLICE DEPARTMENT, LOS ANGELES PORT POLICE, WILLIAM PACK, ROBERTO PEREZ, STEVEN ANGULO, QUENTIN VILLANUEVA, JOSE MAGANA, ANDREW SKLARSH, ALFREDO MOYA, and CHARLES MIDDLETON filed a Joint Stipulation
More

ORDER TO DISMISS ENTIRE ACTION WITH PREJUDICE

On January 5, 2018, Plaintiffs HENRY RENE MEDINA III and ANTHONY MEDINA, individually and as the Successors in Interest to the Estate of Henry Rene Medina, Jr., and Defendants CITY OF LOS ANGELES, LOS ANGELES POLICE DEPARTMENT, LOS ANGELES PORT POLICE, WILLIAM PACK, ROBERTO PEREZ, STEVEN ANGULO, QUENTIN VILLANUEVA, JOSE MAGANA, ANDREW SKLARSH, ALFREDO MOYA, and CHARLES MIDDLETON filed a Joint Stipulation to Dismiss Entire Action With Prejudice. In light of that Stipulation and pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1), the Court hereby dismisses the above-captioned action against Defendants CITY OF LOS ANGELES, LOS ANGELES POLICE DEPARTMENT, LOS ANGELES PORT POLICE, WILLIAM PACK, ROBERTO PEREZ, STEVEN ANGULO, QUENTIN VILLANUEVA, JOSE MAGANA, ANDREW SKLARSH, ALFREDO MOYA, and CHARLES MIDDLETON in its entirety with prejudice. Each party shall bear their own costs and fees incurred during the course of this action.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer