Randal McKissick v. J. Gastelo, CV 17-2986-SJO (AS). (2018)
Court: District Court, C.D. California
Number: infdco20180124844
Visitors: 18
Filed: Jan. 19, 2018
Latest Update: Jan. 19, 2018
Summary: ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE S. JAMES OTERO , District Judge . Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. section 636, the Court has reviewed the Petition, all of the records herein and the attached Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge to which no objections were filed. Accordingly, the Court concurs with and accepts the findings and conclusions of the Magistrate Judge. IT IS ORDERED that Judgment be entered denying and dism
Summary: ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE S. JAMES OTERO , District Judge . Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. section 636, the Court has reviewed the Petition, all of the records herein and the attached Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge to which no objections were filed. Accordingly, the Court concurs with and accepts the findings and conclusions of the Magistrate Judge. IT IS ORDERED that Judgment be entered denying and dismi..
More
ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
S. JAMES OTERO, District Judge.
Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. section 636, the Court has reviewed the Petition, all of the records herein and the attached Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge to which no objections were filed. Accordingly, the Court concurs with and accepts the findings and conclusions of the Magistrate Judge.
IT IS ORDERED that Judgment be entered denying and dismissing the Petition with prejudice.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk serve copies of this Order, the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation and the Judgment herein on counsel for Petitioner and counsel for Respondent.
LET JUDGMENT BE ENTERED ACCORDINGLY.
Source: Leagle
