Daniel Salazar v. San Bernardino County Sheriffs Department, ED CV 16-2595-FMO (KKx). (2018)
Court: District Court, C.D. California
Number: infdco20180129624
Visitors: 14
Filed: Jan. 25, 2018
Latest Update: Jan. 25, 2018
Summary: ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE FERNANDO M. OLGUIN , District Judge . Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636, the Court has reviewed the Complaint, the relevant records on file, and the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge. No objections have been filed. The Court accepts the findings and recommendation of the Magistrate Judge. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that (a) Defendants' Motion to Dismiss is granted in part; and (b) Judgment be
Summary: ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE FERNANDO M. OLGUIN , District Judge . Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636, the Court has reviewed the Complaint, the relevant records on file, and the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge. No objections have been filed. The Court accepts the findings and recommendation of the Magistrate Judge. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that (a) Defendants' Motion to Dismiss is granted in part; and (b) Judgment be ..
More
ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
FERNANDO M. OLGUIN, District Judge.
Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the Complaint, the relevant records on file, and the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge. No objections have been filed. The Court accepts the findings and recommendation of the Magistrate Judge.
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that (a) Defendants' Motion to Dismiss is granted in part; and (b) Judgment be entered dismissing this action without prejudice.
Source: Leagle
