Owens v. Cowan, CV 17-03674-FMO (JDE). (2018)
Court: District Court, C.D. California
Number: infdco20180221f89
Visitors: 25
Filed: Feb. 16, 2018
Latest Update: Feb. 16, 2018
Summary: ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE FERNANDO M. OLGUIN , District Judge . Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636, the Court has reviewed the records on file, including the operative Second Amended Complaint, the three pending Motions to Dismiss (Dkt. Nos. 39, 40 and 52), and the Motion for Leave to File a Third Amended Complaint, all related supporting and opposing briefing, and the Report and Recommendation of the assigned United States Magistrate Judge. No p
Summary: ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE FERNANDO M. OLGUIN , District Judge . Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636, the Court has reviewed the records on file, including the operative Second Amended Complaint, the three pending Motions to Dismiss (Dkt. Nos. 39, 40 and 52), and the Motion for Leave to File a Third Amended Complaint, all related supporting and opposing briefing, and the Report and Recommendation of the assigned United States Magistrate Judge. No pa..
More
ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
FERNANDO M. OLGUIN, District Judge.
Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the records on file, including the operative Second Amended Complaint, the three pending Motions to Dismiss (Dkt. Nos. 39, 40 and 52), and the Motion for Leave to File a Third Amended Complaint, all related supporting and opposing briefing, and the Report and Recommendation of the assigned United States Magistrate Judge. No party has filed timely written objections to the Report and Recommendation nor timely requested additional time in which to do so.
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
1. The Report and Recommendation is approved and accepted;
2. The Motions to Dismiss the Second Amended Complaint filed by Defendants Judge David J. Cowan (Dkt. 39), the County of Los Angeles, sued as the County of Los Angeles Child Support Services (Dkt. 40), and Larry D. Lewellyn and Law Offices of Larry D. Lewellyn (Dkt. 52) are GRANTED;
3. The Motion for Leave to filed a Third Amended Complaint filed by Plaintiff is DENIED;
4. Plaintiff's Second Amended Complaint is dismissed as to all defendants without leave to amend and with prejudice; and
5. Judgment shall be entered accordingly.
Source: Leagle
