Filed: Feb. 23, 2018
Latest Update: Feb. 23, 2018
Summary: FINAL JUDGMENT S. JAMES OTERO , District Judge . For reasons stated in the Court's Order Granting Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment as to Non-Infringement of U.S. Patent No. 7,081,195 [Docket No. 144], and Denying Plaintiff's Motion for Partial Summary Judgment as to No Invalidity [Docket No. 149], entered on February 5, 2018 [Docket No. 226], IT IS ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that final judgment be and is entered in favor of Defendant AgaMatrix, Inc. ("AgaMatrix") and against Plaintiff Dex
Summary: FINAL JUDGMENT S. JAMES OTERO , District Judge . For reasons stated in the Court's Order Granting Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment as to Non-Infringement of U.S. Patent No. 7,081,195 [Docket No. 144], and Denying Plaintiff's Motion for Partial Summary Judgment as to No Invalidity [Docket No. 149], entered on February 5, 2018 [Docket No. 226], IT IS ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that final judgment be and is entered in favor of Defendant AgaMatrix, Inc. ("AgaMatrix") and against Plaintiff Dexc..
More
FINAL JUDGMENT
S. JAMES OTERO, District Judge.
For reasons stated in the Court's Order Granting Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment as to Non-Infringement of U.S. Patent No. 7,081,195 [Docket No. 144], and Denying Plaintiff's Motion for Partial Summary Judgment as to No Invalidity [Docket No. 149], entered on February 5, 2018 [Docket No. 226],
IT IS ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that final judgment be and is entered in favor of Defendant AgaMatrix, Inc. ("AgaMatrix") and against Plaintiff Dexcom, Inc. ("Dexcom") as follows:
1. Final judgment of non-infringement is hereby entered in favor of AgaMatrix and against Dexcom;
2. AgaMatrix's defenses and counterclaims in its Answer to Dexcom's First Amended Complaint for Patent Infringement are dismissed without prejudice;
3. Any award of AgaMatrix's reasonable attorneys' fees, as well as its non-taxable costs, will be decided by separate order in response to any motion for same filed by AgaMatrix pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 54 and LR.'s 54-10, 54-11.
4. As the prevailing party, AgaMatrix is entitled to an award of its taxable costs. Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(d)(1), LR. 54-1.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
