Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Wildman v. Arnold, CV 16-08570 JLS (JDE). (2018)

Court: District Court, C.D. California Number: infdco20180309b28 Visitors: 7
Filed: Mar. 06, 2018
Latest Update: Mar. 06, 2018
Summary: ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE JOSEPHINE L. STATON , District Judge . Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636, the Court has reviewed the Petition, Traverse, and Motion to Stay filed by Petitioner, the Answer and Opposition to the Motion to Stay filed by Respondent, the records on file, and the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge. Petitioner has filed no objections to the Report and Recommendation. The Court accordingly accepts
More

ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the Petition, Traverse, and Motion to Stay filed by Petitioner, the Answer and Opposition to the Motion to Stay filed by Respondent, the records on file, and the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge. Petitioner has filed no objections to the Report and Recommendation. The Court accordingly accepts the findings and recommendation of the Magistrate Judge.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that:

(1) The Motion to Stay (Dkt. 26) is DENIED;

(2) Petitioner's request for an evidentiary hearing is DENIED; and

(3) Judgment shall be entered denying the petition and dismissing this action with prejudice.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer