Mendez v. Selene Finance LP, 2:16-cv-09335-ODW-FFM. (2018)
Court: District Court, C.D. California
Number: infdco20180314941
Visitors: 13
Filed: Mar. 12, 2018
Latest Update: Mar. 12, 2018
Summary: JUDGMENT OTIS D. WRIGHT, II , District Judge . On November 17, 2016, Plaintiff Serafin Mendez filed this action in Los Angeles Superior Court. (ECF No. 1-1.) Defendant Selene Finance LP subsequently removed the case to federal court, and moved for summary judgment on all of Plaintiff's claims. (ECF Nos. 1, 50.) Defendant M&T Bank joined in the Motion. (ECF No. 57.) The Court granted Selene's Motion for Summary Judgment in full. (ECF No. 59.) It is therefore ORDERED, ADJUDGED, and DECREE
Summary: JUDGMENT OTIS D. WRIGHT, II , District Judge . On November 17, 2016, Plaintiff Serafin Mendez filed this action in Los Angeles Superior Court. (ECF No. 1-1.) Defendant Selene Finance LP subsequently removed the case to federal court, and moved for summary judgment on all of Plaintiff's claims. (ECF Nos. 1, 50.) Defendant M&T Bank joined in the Motion. (ECF No. 57.) The Court granted Selene's Motion for Summary Judgment in full. (ECF No. 59.) It is therefore ORDERED, ADJUDGED, and DECREED..
More
JUDGMENT
OTIS D. WRIGHT, II, District Judge.
On November 17, 2016, Plaintiff Serafin Mendez filed this action in Los Angeles Superior Court. (ECF No. 1-1.) Defendant Selene Finance LP subsequently removed the case to federal court, and moved for summary judgment on all of Plaintiff's claims. (ECF Nos. 1, 50.) Defendant M&T Bank joined in the Motion. (ECF No. 57.) The Court granted Selene's Motion for Summary Judgment in full. (ECF No. 59.)
It is therefore ORDERED, ADJUDGED, and DECREED as follows:
1. Plaintiff Serafin Mendez shall recover nothing from Defendants; and
2. Plaintiff Serafin Mendez's Second Amended Complaint is dismissed on the merits and with prejudice.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
