Mnyandu v. County of Los Angeles, CV 14-6485 DSF (FFM). (2018)
Court: District Court, C.D. California
Number: infdco20180322a71
Visitors: 5
Filed: Mar. 19, 2018
Latest Update: Mar. 19, 2018
Summary: ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE DALE S. FISCHER , District Judge . Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636, the Court has reviewed the entire record in this action, the attached Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge (the "Report"), and the objections thereto. Good cause appearing, the Court concurs with and accepts the findings of fact, conclusions of law, and recommendations contained in the Report after having made a d
Summary: ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE DALE S. FISCHER , District Judge . Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636, the Court has reviewed the entire record in this action, the attached Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge (the "Report"), and the objections thereto. Good cause appearing, the Court concurs with and accepts the findings of fact, conclusions of law, and recommendations contained in the Report after having made a de..
More
ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
DALE S. FISCHER, District Judge.
Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the entire record in this action, the attached Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge (the "Report"), and the objections thereto. Good cause appearing, the Court concurs with and accepts the findings of fact, conclusions of law, and recommendations contained in the Report after having made a de novo determination of the portions to which objections were directed.
IT IS ORDERED that the motion for summary judgment as to all plaintiff's claims against defendants Sedgwick Claims Management Services, Inc., Leslie Lunsway, and Jeffrey Rose (the "Sedgwick Defendants") is granted; and (2) all of plaintiff's claims against the Sedgwick Defendants are dismissed with prejudice.
Source: Leagle
