Rocha v. Montgomery, ED CV 16-00864-VBF-JDE. (2018)
Court: District Court, C.D. California
Number: infdco20180329955
Visitors: 8
Filed: Mar. 27, 2018
Latest Update: Mar. 27, 2018
Summary: ORDER Adopting the R & R: Denying Habeas Corpus Petition; Dismissing Case With Prejudice; Directing Entry of Separate Judgment; Terminating the Case (JS-6) VALERIE BAKER FAIRBANK , Senior District Judge . Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636, the Court has reviewed the Petition (Dkt. No. 1), Respondent's Answer to the Petition (Dkt. No. 11), Petitioner's Reply (Dkt. No 18), the records on file, and the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge (Dkt. No. 28) and the Objections
Summary: ORDER Adopting the R & R: Denying Habeas Corpus Petition; Dismissing Case With Prejudice; Directing Entry of Separate Judgment; Terminating the Case (JS-6) VALERIE BAKER FAIRBANK , Senior District Judge . Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636, the Court has reviewed the Petition (Dkt. No. 1), Respondent's Answer to the Petition (Dkt. No. 11), Petitioner's Reply (Dkt. No 18), the records on file, and the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge (Dkt. No. 28) and the Objections t..
More
ORDER Adopting the R & R: Denying Habeas Corpus Petition; Dismissing Case With Prejudice;
Directing Entry of Separate Judgment; Terminating the Case (JS-6)
VALERIE BAKER FAIRBANK, Senior District Judge.
Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the Petition (Dkt. No. 1), Respondent's Answer to the Petition (Dkt. No. 11), Petitioner's Reply (Dkt. No 18), the records on file, and the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge (Dkt. No. 28) and the Objections thereto filed by Petitioner (Dkt. No. 33). Further, the Court has engaged in a de novo review of those portions of the Report and Recommendation to which objections have been made. The Court accepts the findings and recommendation of the Magistrate Judge.
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that:
(1) Petitioner's request for an evidentiary hearing is DENIED;
(2) The habeas corpus petition is DENIED.
(3) This action is DISMISSED with prejudice.
(4) As required by Fed. R. Civ. P. 58(a), judgment consistent with this Order and with the R&R shall be entered as a separate document.
The Clerk of Court shall TERMINATE this case (JS-6).
Source: Leagle
