Thanh Van Quang v. Paramo, 8:16-cv-01086-PA-KES. (2018)
Court: District Court, C.D. California
Number: infdco20180329964
Visitors: 22
Filed: Mar. 27, 2018
Latest Update: Mar. 27, 2018
Summary: ORDER ACCEPTING FINAL REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE PERCY ANDERSON , District Judge . Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636, the Court has reviewed the First Amended Petition (Dkt. 22), the other records on file herein, the initial Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge (Dkt. 33), and the Final Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge (Dkt. 36). No objections to the initial Report and Recommendation were filed, and the dead
Summary: ORDER ACCEPTING FINAL REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE PERCY ANDERSON , District Judge . Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636, the Court has reviewed the First Amended Petition (Dkt. 22), the other records on file herein, the initial Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge (Dkt. 33), and the Final Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge (Dkt. 36). No objections to the initial Report and Recommendation were filed, and the deadl..
More
ORDER ACCEPTING FINAL REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
PERCY ANDERSON, District Judge.
Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the First Amended Petition (Dkt. 22), the other records on file herein, the initial Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge (Dkt. 33), and the Final Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge (Dkt. 36). No objections to the initial Report and Recommendation were filed, and the deadline for filing such objections has passed. The Court accepts the report, findings, and recommendations of the Magistrate Judge.
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Judgment be entered denying the First amended Petition and dismissing this action with prejudice.
Source: Leagle
