Franklin v. Madden, CV 17-4281 DSF(JC). (2018)
Court: District Court, C.D. California
Number: infdco20180406981
Visitors: 8
Filed: Apr. 04, 2018
Latest Update: Apr. 04, 2018
Summary: ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE DALE S. FISCHER , District Judge . Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636, the Court has reviewed the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus by a Person in State Custody ("Petition") and supporting documents, the parties' submissions in connection with the Motion to Stay, and all of the records herein, including the January 29, 2018 Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge ("Report and Recommend
Summary: ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE DALE S. FISCHER , District Judge . Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636, the Court has reviewed the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus by a Person in State Custody ("Petition") and supporting documents, the parties' submissions in connection with the Motion to Stay, and all of the records herein, including the January 29, 2018 Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge ("Report and Recommenda..
More
ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
DALE S. FISCHER, District Judge.
Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus by a Person in State Custody ("Petition") and supporting documents, the parties' submissions in connection with the Motion to Stay, and all of the records herein, including the January 29, 2018 Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge ("Report and Recommendation"). The Court approves and accepts the Report and Recommendation.
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that (1) the Petition and this action are dismissed with prejudice because petitioner's claims are barred by the statute of limitations; (2) the Motion to Stay is denied as moot; and (3) the Clerk shall enter judgment accordingly.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk serve copies of this Order, the Report and Recommendation, and the Judgment herein on petitioner and counsel for respondent.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
