Heinemann v. Berryhill, 5:17-CV-00007 (VEB). (2018)
Court: District Court, C.D. California
Number: infdco20180413992
Visitors: 5
Filed: Apr. 12, 2018
Latest Update: Apr. 12, 2018
Summary: JUDGMENT VICTOR E. BIANCHINI , Magistrate Judge . For the reasons set forth in the accompanying Decision and Order, it is hereby DECREED THAT (1) Plaintiff's request for an order remanding this case for further proceedings is GRANTED and the Commissioner's decision is REVERSED; (2) the Commissioner's request for an order affirming the Commissioner's final decision and dismissing the action is DENIED; (3) judgment is entered in Plaintiff's favor and this case is REMANDED for further proceedi
Summary: JUDGMENT VICTOR E. BIANCHINI , Magistrate Judge . For the reasons set forth in the accompanying Decision and Order, it is hereby DECREED THAT (1) Plaintiff's request for an order remanding this case for further proceedings is GRANTED and the Commissioner's decision is REVERSED; (2) the Commissioner's request for an order affirming the Commissioner's final decision and dismissing the action is DENIED; (3) judgment is entered in Plaintiff's favor and this case is REMANDED for further proceedin..
More
JUDGMENT
VICTOR E. BIANCHINI, Magistrate Judge.
For the reasons set forth in the accompanying Decision and Order, it is hereby DECREED THAT (1) Plaintiff's request for an order remanding this case for further proceedings is GRANTED and the Commissioner's decision is REVERSED; (2) the Commissioner's request for an order affirming the Commissioner's final decision and dismissing the action is DENIED; (3) judgment is entered in Plaintiff's favor and this case is REMANDED for further proceedings consistent with the Decision and Order; and (4) this case is CLOSED without prejudice to a timely application for attorneys' fees and costs.
Source: Leagle
