ALS Scan, Inc. v. Cloudflare, Inc., CV 16-5051-GW(AFMx). (2018)
Court: District Court, C.D. California
Number: infdco20180502c43
Visitors: 12
Filed: Apr. 30, 2018
Latest Update: Apr. 30, 2018
Summary: JUDGMENT IN FAVOR OF DEFENDANT STEADFAST NETWORKS, LLC. GEORGE H. WU , District Judge . On March 30, 2018, the Court granted Defendant Steadfast Networks LLC's ("Steadfast") motion for summary judgment on ALS Scan, Inc.'s ("ALS") claims of contributory copyright infringement, vicarious copyright infringement, and contributory trademark infringement, resolving all claims against Steadfast with prejudice. See Dkt. 443. The Court now issues a final judgment on all of ALS's claims, including:
Summary: JUDGMENT IN FAVOR OF DEFENDANT STEADFAST NETWORKS, LLC. GEORGE H. WU , District Judge . On March 30, 2018, the Court granted Defendant Steadfast Networks LLC's ("Steadfast") motion for summary judgment on ALS Scan, Inc.'s ("ALS") claims of contributory copyright infringement, vicarious copyright infringement, and contributory trademark infringement, resolving all claims against Steadfast with prejudice. See Dkt. 443. The Court now issues a final judgment on all of ALS's claims, including: ..
More
JUDGMENT IN FAVOR OF DEFENDANT STEADFAST NETWORKS, LLC.
GEORGE H. WU, District Judge.
On March 30, 2018, the Court granted Defendant Steadfast Networks LLC's ("Steadfast") motion for summary judgment on ALS Scan, Inc.'s ("ALS") claims of contributory copyright infringement, vicarious copyright infringement, and contributory trademark infringement, resolving all claims against Steadfast with prejudice. See Dkt. 443. The Court now issues a final judgment on all of ALS's claims, including:
1. Contributory Copyright Infringement. ALS's claim of contributory copyright infringement against Steadfast is dismissed with prejudice. Dkt. 443.
2. Vicarious Copyright Infringement. ALS's claim of vicarious copyright infringement against Steadfast is dismissed with prejudice. Dkt. 443.
3. Contributory Trademark Infringement. ALS's claim of contributory trademark infringement against Steadfast is dismissed with prejudice. Dkt. 443.
The Court GRANTS FINAL JUDGMENT in favor of Steadfast and against ALS as to all the claims by ALS in the case.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
