Nersesian v. Nike Retail Services, Inc., 8:17-cv-02073-DOC-E. (2018)
Court: District Court, C.D. California
Number: infdco20180503d91
Visitors: 27
Filed: May 02, 2018
Latest Update: May 02, 2018
Summary: ORDER GRANTING JOINT STIPULATION TO REMAND [16] DAVID O. CARTER , District Judge . The Court having received and reviewed the Joint Stipulation to Remand submitted by Plaintiff Madatya Nersesian ("Plaintiff") and Defendants Nike Retail Services, Inc., Rianna Marie Lopez, and William Mathes (collectively, "Defendants"), and good cause appearing; IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT: 1. The action shall be remanded to the Superior Court for the State of California, County of Orange. 2. The Clerk of t
Summary: ORDER GRANTING JOINT STIPULATION TO REMAND [16] DAVID O. CARTER , District Judge . The Court having received and reviewed the Joint Stipulation to Remand submitted by Plaintiff Madatya Nersesian ("Plaintiff") and Defendants Nike Retail Services, Inc., Rianna Marie Lopez, and William Mathes (collectively, "Defendants"), and good cause appearing; IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT: 1. The action shall be remanded to the Superior Court for the State of California, County of Orange. 2. The Clerk of th..
More
ORDER GRANTING JOINT STIPULATION TO REMAND [16]
DAVID O. CARTER, District Judge.
The Court having received and reviewed the Joint Stipulation to Remand submitted by Plaintiff Madatya Nersesian ("Plaintiff") and Defendants Nike Retail Services, Inc., Rianna Marie Lopez, and William Mathes (collectively, "Defendants"), and good cause appearing;
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT:
1. The action shall be remanded to the Superior Court for the State of California, County of Orange.
2. The Clerk of this Court is instructed to transmit forthwith a certified copy of this Order to the Clerk of the Superior Court for the County of Orange.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
