Harrell v. Blankenship, ED CV 15-549-CJC (SP). (2018)
Court: District Court, C.D. California
Number: infdco20180509a89
Visitors: 21
Filed: May 04, 2018
Latest Update: May 04, 2018
Summary: ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE CORMAC J. CARNEY , District Judge . Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636, the Court has reviewed the Complaint, records on file, and the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge. The parties have not filed any written Objections to the Report within the time permitted. The Court accepts the findings and recommendation of the Magistrate Judge. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that defendants' Motion for Summa
Summary: ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE CORMAC J. CARNEY , District Judge . Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636, the Court has reviewed the Complaint, records on file, and the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge. The parties have not filed any written Objections to the Report within the time permitted. The Court accepts the findings and recommendation of the Magistrate Judge. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that defendants' Motion for Summar..
More
ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
CORMAC J. CARNEY, District Judge.
Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the Complaint, records on file, and the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge. The parties have not filed any written Objections to the Report within the time permitted. The Court accepts the findings and recommendation of the Magistrate Judge.
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment (docket no. 43) and plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment (docket no. 67) are both denied.
Source: Leagle
