Snyder v. Riverside County, ED CV 15-817-DSF (SP). (2018)
Court: District Court, C.D. California
Number: infdco20180523b33
Visitors: 11
Filed: May 21, 2018
Latest Update: May 21, 2018
Summary: ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE DALE S. FISCHER , District Judge . Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636, the Court has reviewed the Complaint, records on file, and the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge. Further, the Court has engaged in a de novo review of those portions of the Report to which plaintiff has objected. The Court accepts the findings and recommendation of the Magistrate Judge. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that: (1)
Summary: ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE DALE S. FISCHER , District Judge . Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636, the Court has reviewed the Complaint, records on file, and the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge. Further, the Court has engaged in a de novo review of those portions of the Report to which plaintiff has objected. The Court accepts the findings and recommendation of the Magistrate Judge. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that: (1) ..
More
ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
DALE S. FISCHER, District Judge.
Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the Complaint, records on file, and the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge. Further, the Court has engaged in a de novo review of those portions of the Report to which plaintiff has objected. The Court accepts the findings and recommendation of the Magistrate Judge.
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that: (1) defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment (docket no. 58) is granted; (2) plaintiff's request for leave to file a Sur-Reply (docket no. 82) is denied; (3) plaintiff's request for additional discovery, which was effectively made under Rule 56(d) (not Rule 56(f) as stated in the Report) is denied; (4) plaintiff's request to add defendants to this action is denied as futile; (5) plaintiff's motion to appoint a neutral medical expert and plumbing expert witness (docket no. 81) is denied as moot; and (6) Judgment will be entered dismissing the Complaint and this action with prejudice.
Source: Leagle
