Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Belmontez v. Berryhill, CV 17-03024-JDE. (2018)

Court: District Court, C.D. California Number: infdco20180524931 Visitors: 3
Filed: May 23, 2018
Latest Update: May 23, 2018
Summary: ORDER AWARDING ATTORNEY FEES UNDER THE EQUAL ACCESS TO JUSTICE ACT, PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. 2412(d), AND COSTS, PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. 1920 JOHN D. EARLY , Magistrate Judge . Based upon the parties' Stipulation for the Award and Payment of Equal Access to Justice Act Fees and Costs, IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiff shall be awarded attorney fees under 28 U.S.C. 2412 in the amount of $2,182.76, and no costs under 28 U.S.C. 1920, subject to the terms of the above-referenced Stipulation, to i
More

ORDER AWARDING ATTORNEY FEES UNDER THE EQUAL ACCESS TO JUSTICE ACT, PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d), AND COSTS, PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. § 1920

Based upon the parties' Stipulation for the Award and Payment of Equal Access to Justice Act Fees and Costs, IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiff shall be awarded attorney fees under 28 U.S.C. § 2412 in the amount of $2,182.76, and no costs under 28 U.S.C. § 1920, subject to the terms of the above-referenced Stipulation, to include the United States Department of the Treasury's Offset Program pursuant to Astrue v. Ratliff, 130 S.Ct. 2521 (2010). The Petition at Dkt. 20 is DENIED as moot in light of the Stipulation.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer