Radilla v. Entzel, ED CV 17-01357-VBF-SS. (2018)
Court: District Court, C.D. California
Number: infdco20180606951
Visitors: 15
Filed: Jun. 01, 2018
Latest Update: Jun. 01, 2018
Summary: ORDER ADOPTING THE R&R: DENYING PETITION AS MOOT, DISMISSING ACTION WITHOUT PREJUDICE, TERMINATING THE CASE (JS-6) VALERIE BAKER FAIRBANK , District Judge . Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636, the Court reviewed the habeas corpus petition and records herein, the Report & Recommendation, and petitioner's objections. Respondent has not filed a response to the objections within the time permitted by Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b). Accordingly, the Court has conducted de novo review of the parts of the R&R
Summary: ORDER ADOPTING THE R&R: DENYING PETITION AS MOOT, DISMISSING ACTION WITHOUT PREJUDICE, TERMINATING THE CASE (JS-6) VALERIE BAKER FAIRBANK , District Judge . Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636, the Court reviewed the habeas corpus petition and records herein, the Report & Recommendation, and petitioner's objections. Respondent has not filed a response to the objections within the time permitted by Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b). Accordingly, the Court has conducted de novo review of the parts of the R&R t..
More
ORDER ADOPTING THE R&R:
DENYING PETITION AS MOOT, DISMISSING ACTION WITHOUT PREJUDICE, TERMINATING THE CASE (JS-6)
VALERIE BAKER FAIRBANK, District Judge.
Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court reviewed the habeas corpus petition and records herein, the Report & Recommendation, and petitioner's objections. Respondent has not filed a response to the objections within the time permitted by Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b). Accordingly, the Court has conducted de novo review of the parts of the R&R to which petitioner specifically objected and clear-error review of the remainder of the R&R. The Court finds no error of law, fact, or logic in the R&R.
Accordingly, it is hereby ordered that:
Petitioner's objection [Doc #17] is OVERRULED. The Report and Recommendation [Doc #16] is ADOPTED. Respondent's Motion to Dismiss as Moot [Doc #14] is GRANTED. The First Amended Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus
Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 2241 [Doc #9] is DENIED as moot.
A separate judgment shall be entered dismissing this action without prejudice.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
