Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Liberty Mutual Insurance Company v. Schrage, 2:18-cv-00818 DSF(SSX). (2018)

Court: District Court, C.D. California Number: infdco20180620891 Visitors: 2
Filed: Jun. 18, 2018
Latest Update: Jun. 18, 2018
Summary: JUDGMENT STACIE L. BRANDT , District Judge . This action came on for hearing before the Court on June 4, 2018, on a Motion for Summary Judgment, and the evidence presented having been fully considered, the issues having been duly heard and a decision having been duly rendered, IT IS ORDERED AND ADJUDGED: 1. That judgment is entered in favor of Plaintiff Liberty Mutual Insurance Company and against Defendants Michael Schrage, Catherine Schrage, and Joseph Schrage, and each of them, jointly
More

JUDGMENT

This action came on for hearing before the Court on June 4, 2018, on a Motion for Summary Judgment, and the evidence presented having been fully considered, the issues having been duly heard and a decision having been duly rendered, IT IS ORDERED AND ADJUDGED:

1. That judgment is entered in favor of Plaintiff Liberty Mutual Insurance Company and against Defendants Michael Schrage, Catherine Schrage, and Joseph Schrage, and each of them, jointly and severally, in the amount of $8,077.00; and that post-judgment interest will accrue at the Federal rate pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1961 from the date of entry of judgment;

2. That Defendants Michael Schrage, Catherine Schrage, and Joseph Schrage, and each of them, jointly and severally, are required to place Plaintiff in funds, as collateral security, in the amount of $1,091,923.00 to secure Plaintiff against potential liability on Bond No. 024065581 filed in Los Angeles Superior Court Case No. BC579623, styled Schrage v. Schrage, and associated costs and expenses, including attorney fees, in accordance with the Court's Order dated June 4, 2018;

3. That Plaintiff recover its costs of suit pursuant to a bill of costs filed in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 1920 and its attorney fees as the prevailing party under the indemnity agreement pursuant to motion.

4. That the action be dismissed without prejudice;

5. That this Court reserves jurisdiction to enforce the judgment and to determine Plaintiff's entitlement to recover costs and attorney fees.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer