Filed: Jun. 20, 2018
Latest Update: Jun. 20, 2018
Summary: FINAL JUDGMENT ANDREW GUILFORD , District Judge . FINAL JUDGMENT In accordance with the Court's Findings of Facts and Conclusions of Law issued May 30, 2018 ("Findings and Conclusions," Dkt. No. 166), the Court finds that Defendant Luraco, Inc. ("Luraco") is entitled to final judgment against Plaintiff Ecojet, Inc. ("Ecojet") regarding the above-captioned case tried November 2-3, 2018. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that in accordance with the Court's disposition discussed i
Summary: FINAL JUDGMENT ANDREW GUILFORD , District Judge . FINAL JUDGMENT In accordance with the Court's Findings of Facts and Conclusions of Law issued May 30, 2018 ("Findings and Conclusions," Dkt. No. 166), the Court finds that Defendant Luraco, Inc. ("Luraco") is entitled to final judgment against Plaintiff Ecojet, Inc. ("Ecojet") regarding the above-captioned case tried November 2-3, 2018. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that in accordance with the Court's disposition discussed in..
More
FINAL JUDGMENT
ANDREW GUILFORD, District Judge.
FINAL JUDGMENT
In accordance with the Court's Findings of Facts and Conclusions of Law issued May 30, 2018 ("Findings and Conclusions," Dkt. No. 166), the Court finds that Defendant Luraco, Inc. ("Luraco") is entitled to final judgment against Plaintiff Ecojet, Inc. ("Ecojet") regarding the above-captioned case tried November 2-3, 2018.
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that in accordance with the Court's disposition discussed in the Findings and Conclusions:
1. Judgment is entered in favor of Luraco against Ecojet regarding Ecojet's claim for patent infringement against Luraco; Ecojet's claim thereto is DENIED.
2. Judgment is entered in favor of Luraco against Ecojet regarding Luraco's claim of non-infringement against Ecojet; Luraco's claim thereto is GRANTED.
The Court reaches this result after reviewing all arguments and evidence presented in this matter, including at trial and in the parties' Closing Argument briefs (See Dkts. 158, 159, 161). Any arguments not specifically addressed were either unpersuasive or not necessary to reach considering the Court's holdings.
The Court determines that Luraco is the prevailing party and awards costs to Luraco.
