Douglas v. Carr, CV 18-01865 PA (RAO). (2018)
Court: District Court, C.D. California
Number: infdco20180717600
Visitors: 18
Filed: Jul. 13, 2018
Latest Update: Jul. 13, 2018
Summary: ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE PERCY ANDERSON , District Judge . Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636, the Court has reviewed the Petition, all of the records and files herein, and the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation. The Court has further engaged in a de novo review of those portions of the Report and Recommendation issued on June 22, 2018, to which Petitioner has objected. The Court hereby accepts and adopts the findings,
Summary: ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE PERCY ANDERSON , District Judge . Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636, the Court has reviewed the Petition, all of the records and files herein, and the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation. The Court has further engaged in a de novo review of those portions of the Report and Recommendation issued on June 22, 2018, to which Petitioner has objected. The Court hereby accepts and adopts the findings, ..
More
ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
PERCY ANDERSON, District Judge.
Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the Petition, all of the records and files herein, and the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation. The Court has further engaged in a de novo review of those portions of the Report and Recommendation issued on June 22, 2018, to which Petitioner has objected. The Court hereby accepts and adopts the findings, conclusions, and recommendations of the Magistrate Judge.
IT IS ORDERED that the Petition is denied, and Judgment shall be entered dismissing this action with prejudice.
Source: Leagle
