Shad v. Nielsen, SACV 18-00508-MWF (JDE). (2018)
Court: District Court, C.D. California
Number: infdco20180822836
Visitors: 7
Filed: Aug. 21, 2018
Latest Update: Aug. 21, 2018
Summary: ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE MICHAEL W. FITZGERALD , District Judge . Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636, the Court has reviewed the Petition, the Motion to Dismiss the Petition filed by Respondents ("Motion to Dismiss"), the Opposition and Reply briefs filed in opposition to and in support of the Motion to Dismiss, the Motion for Discovery filed by Petitioner ("Motion for Discovery") and the Opposition and Reply briefs filed in opposition to and in
Summary: ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE MICHAEL W. FITZGERALD , District Judge . Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636, the Court has reviewed the Petition, the Motion to Dismiss the Petition filed by Respondents ("Motion to Dismiss"), the Opposition and Reply briefs filed in opposition to and in support of the Motion to Dismiss, the Motion for Discovery filed by Petitioner ("Motion for Discovery") and the Opposition and Reply briefs filed in opposition to and in ..
More
ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
MICHAEL W. FITZGERALD, District Judge.
Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the Petition, the Motion to Dismiss the Petition filed by Respondents ("Motion to Dismiss"), the Opposition and Reply briefs filed in opposition to and in support of the Motion to Dismiss, the Motion for Discovery filed by Petitioner ("Motion for Discovery") and the Opposition and Reply briefs filed in opposition to and in support of the Motion for Discovery, the Report and Recommendation ("Report") of the United States Magistrate Judge, and the Objections to the Report filed by Petitioner. Further, the Court has engaged in a de novo review of those portions of the Report and Recommendation to which objections have been made. The Court accepts the findings and recommendation of the Magistrate Judge.
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that:
(1) Respondent's Motion to Dismiss (Dkt. 8) is GRANTED;
(2) Petitioner's Motion for Discovery (Dkt. 10) is DENIED as moot; and
(3) Judgment be entered dismissing this action without prejudice.
Source: Leagle
