Robinson v. County of Riverside, ED CV 17-323-DSF (SP). (2018)
Court: District Court, C.D. California
Number: infdco20180823a47
Visitors: 5
Filed: Aug. 21, 2018
Latest Update: Aug. 21, 2018
Summary: ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE DALE S. FISCHER , District Judge . Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636, the Court has reviewed the Complaint, records on file, and the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge. Defendants have not filed any written Objections to the Report within the time permitted. The Court accepts the findings and recommendation of the Magistrate Judge. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that defendants' Motion to Dismiss
Summary: ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE DALE S. FISCHER , District Judge . Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636, the Court has reviewed the Complaint, records on file, and the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge. Defendants have not filed any written Objections to the Report within the time permitted. The Court accepts the findings and recommendation of the Magistrate Judge. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that defendants' Motion to Dismiss (..
More
ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
DALE S. FISCHER, District Judge.
Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the Complaint, records on file, and the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge. Defendants have not filed any written Objections to the Report within the time permitted. The Court accepts the findings and recommendation of the Magistrate Judge.
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that defendants' Motion to Dismiss (docket no. 37) is denied. Defendants are ordered to answer the Complaint within fourteen days of this Order.
Source: Leagle
