Solofill, LLC v. Rivera, 2:17-cv-02956-SJO-AJW. (2018)
Court: District Court, C.D. California
Number: infdco20180827657
Visitors: 2
Filed: Aug. 23, 2018
Latest Update: Aug. 23, 2018
Summary: JUDGMENT S. JAMES OTERO , District Judge . The Court, having considered Defendants Adrian Rivera and Adrian Rivera Maynez Enterprises, Inc.'s (collectively "Defendants") Motion for Summary Judgment (Dkt. No. 147), the opposition thereto, and the reply in support of the Motion finds that: 1. There are no disputes as to any material fact and Defendants are entitled to judgment as a matter of law on all counts in the First Amended Complaint (Dkt. No. 38); 2. Defendants' Motion for Summary Ju
Summary: JUDGMENT S. JAMES OTERO , District Judge . The Court, having considered Defendants Adrian Rivera and Adrian Rivera Maynez Enterprises, Inc.'s (collectively "Defendants") Motion for Summary Judgment (Dkt. No. 147), the opposition thereto, and the reply in support of the Motion finds that: 1. There are no disputes as to any material fact and Defendants are entitled to judgment as a matter of law on all counts in the First Amended Complaint (Dkt. No. 38); 2. Defendants' Motion for Summary Jud..
More
JUDGMENT
S. JAMES OTERO, District Judge.
The Court, having considered Defendants Adrian Rivera and Adrian Rivera Maynez Enterprises, Inc.'s (collectively "Defendants") Motion for Summary Judgment (Dkt. No. 147), the opposition thereto, and the reply in support of the Motion finds that:
1. There are no disputes as to any material fact and Defendants are entitled to judgment as a matter of law on all counts in the First Amended Complaint (Dkt. No. 38);
2. Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment is hereby GRANTED;
3. The clerk is directed to enter final judgment in favor of Defendants on all causes of action.
4. Defendants are awarded costs as the prevailing party.
Source: Leagle
