Jacqueline A. v. Motion Picture Industry Health Plan, 2:17-CV-4333-JAK-JEM. (2018)
Court: District Court, C.D. California
Number: infdco20180830969
Filed: Aug. 28, 2018
Latest Update: Aug. 28, 2018
Summary: JUDGMENT JOHN A. KRONSTADT , District Judge . This action came on for a bench trial before the Court on June 18, 2018, the Honorable John A. Kronstadt, United States District Judge, presiding. After fully considering the record and the issues, briefs and arguments presented by the parties, and a decision having been duly rendered, IT IS ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that: 1. Plaintiff's request for monetary and other relief is denied in its entirety; 3. Judgment is hereby entered in favor of Defe
Summary: JUDGMENT JOHN A. KRONSTADT , District Judge . This action came on for a bench trial before the Court on June 18, 2018, the Honorable John A. Kronstadt, United States District Judge, presiding. After fully considering the record and the issues, briefs and arguments presented by the parties, and a decision having been duly rendered, IT IS ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that: 1. Plaintiff's request for monetary and other relief is denied in its entirety; 3. Judgment is hereby entered in favor of Defen..
More
JUDGMENT
JOHN A. KRONSTADT, District Judge.
This action came on for a bench trial before the Court on June 18, 2018, the Honorable John A. Kronstadt, United States District Judge, presiding. After fully considering the record and the issues, briefs and arguments presented by the parties, and a decision having been duly rendered,
IT IS ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that:
1. Plaintiff's request for monetary and other relief is denied in its entirety;
3. Judgment is hereby entered in favor of Defendants Motion Picture Industry Health Plan and U.S. Behavioral Health Plan, California (incorrectly named as Optumhealth Behavioral Solutions of California, Inc. in the complaint); and
4. Defendants shall recover their costs.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
