Bravo v. Biter, 2:16-cv-04150-JLS-KES. (2018)
Court: District Court, C.D. California
Number: infdco20180906759
Visitors: 3
Filed: Sep. 05, 2018
Latest Update: Sep. 05, 2018
Summary: ORDER ACCEPTING FINAL REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE JOSEPHINE L. STATON , District Judge . Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636, the Court has reviewed the First Amended Petition, the other records on file herein, the Report and Recommendation, and the Final Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge. The Court has engaged in a de novo review of those portions of the Report and Recommendation to which objections have been made. No objections to the
Summary: ORDER ACCEPTING FINAL REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE JOSEPHINE L. STATON , District Judge . Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636, the Court has reviewed the First Amended Petition, the other records on file herein, the Report and Recommendation, and the Final Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge. The Court has engaged in a de novo review of those portions of the Report and Recommendation to which objections have been made. No objections to the F..
More
ORDER ACCEPTING FINAL REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
JOSEPHINE L. STATON, District Judge.
Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the First Amended Petition, the other records on file herein, the Report and Recommendation, and the Final Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge. The Court has engaged in a de novo review of those portions of the Report and Recommendation to which objections have been made. No objections to the Final Report and Recommendation were filed, and the deadline for filing such objections has passed. The Court accepts the report, findings, and recommendations of the Magistrate Judge. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Judgment be entered denying the First Amended Petition as untimely and dismissing this action with prejudice.
Source: Leagle
